Competence in using open access institutional repositories for improved accessibility of research outputs: The case of selected academic institutions in Tanzania

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorMbughuni, Anna Shangwe
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-01T05:43:14Z
dc.date.issued2025-11-24
dc.descriptionA paper submitted for publication in Alexandria: The Journal of National and International Library and Information Issues
dc.description.abstractPurpose: This study was carried out to investigate the competency level in accessing institutional research productivity among users of academic libraries in Tanzania. Specifically, the study focused on examining the level of competency, assessing where users acquired skills of accessing institutional research productivity, establishing the attitude of library users towards acquiring skills, and identifying the constraints faced in acquiring OAIRs skills. Methodology: The study employed a cross-sectional research design. Systematic, random, and purposive sampling procedures were used to obtain a total of 292 respondents and eight key informants. Both quantitative and qualitative data were collected from academic staff, research fellows, and librarians. Structured questionnaire, interview schedule, and document analysis were used to collect data. Quantitative data were analysed using the SPSS package V20.0, while qualitative data were analysed using content analysis. Results: Key findings indicated that 28.4% of the users are computer competent, information search literate (27.1%), communication skilled (27.1%), and competent in scholarly publishing and self-archiving (20.5%). Results indicated that users acquired skills of accessing institutional research productivity from librarians (22.6%) and library technicians (18.2%). Also, results revealed that 57.9% were positive towards acquiring skills, and 56.9% agreed that acquiring skills of OAIRs facilitates free and quick access However, lack of awareness of the presence of OAIRs (38.6%), unawareness of OAIRs policy (22.8%), and lack of budget for training and advocacy of OAIRs (19.3%) were identified as constraints faced in acquiring OAIRs skills. Conclusion: The study concluded that the competency level on accessibility of institutional research productivity is still low among library users, even though the use of OAIRs in Tanzania is still low. Recommendation: Recommended to review OAIRs policies for managing OAIRs, especially putting up a mechanism for enforcing training among users, and investment in infrastructure for improved accessibility of institutional research productivity in Tanzania institutions
dc.description.sponsorshipPrivate
dc.identifier.citationAPA
dc.identifier.issn0955-7490
dc.identifier.issn2050-4551
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1177/09557490251400574
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholar.mzumbe.ac.tz/handle/123456789/1904
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherSAGE Publications
dc.subjectOpen Access Institutional Repository
dc.subjectOAIRs competency level
dc.subjectresearch productivity
dc.subjectinstitutional research productivity
dc.subjectUnified Theory of Acceptance
dc.subjectUse of Technology (UTAUT)
dc.subjectAcademic staff scholarly works visibility
dc.subjectResearch Output - Visibility
dc.subjectTanzanian Academic Institutions
dc.subjectRepository Usage
dc.subjectRepository Adoption
dc.subjectScholarly Communication
dc.subjectOpen Access
dc.titleCompetence in using open access institutional repositories for improved accessibility of research outputs: The case of selected academic institutions in Tanzania
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Mbughuni, A.S.-(LSD).-(2025).pdf
Size:
497.15 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Articles (LSD)