Improving the legitimacy of investor – state dispute settlement system: can the WTO DSU system Act as a model?
| dc.contributor.author | Cosmas, Julius | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-04-23T11:01:12Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-04-23T11:01:12Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
| dc.description | A research paper submitted to the Canadian Center of Science and Education (CCSE) Vol. 4, No. 1; 2015. | |
| dc.description.abstract | While the World Trade Organization dispute settlement system is prospering, the investor – state dispute settlement system is in shambles and need immediate attention. This article argues that investor – state dispute settlement system need to gather experience from the WTO system so as to increase its legitimacy. The article looks at the issues haunting the investor – state adjudication system and examines how the same have been addressed at the World Trade Organization. The WTO DSU is taken as a comparator because it is being praised for attaining legitimacy within a short period of time. The article concludes that investor – state adjudicative system has a lot to learn from the WTO adjudicative system with regards to costs, timeframe, remedies and the appellate structure. | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | Private | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Chicago | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1927-5242 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ilr.v4n1p1 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://scholar.mzumbe.ac.tz/handle/123456789/712 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Canadian Center of Science and Education | |
| dc.subject | investor | |
| dc.subject | state adjudication system | |
| dc.subject | legitimacy crisis | |
| dc.subject | dispute settlement system | |
| dc.title | Improving the legitimacy of investor – state dispute settlement system: can the WTO DSU system Act as a model? | |
| dc.type | Article |