The appellant, Baraka slo Jailo Mwandembo and one Zuberi slo Jailo Mwila were arraigned before the High Court of Tanzania at Mbeya for the offence of murder cIs 196 of the Penal Code, Cap 16 R.E. 2002. The prosecution ...

This study is an attempt to examine barriers affecting agricultural marketing in Tanzania and measures of remedying them. The barriers involved in the analysis include, inadequate physical infrastructure, unreliable storage ...

Before me is this suit filed by the plaintiff Bytrade Tanzania Limited against the defendant Board of Trustees of Tandahimba Farmers Agricultural Input Trust Fund asking for judgment and decree.

In the District Court of Mbeya the appellant BENEDICTKILEMBE was charged with rape contrary to sections 130 and 131(2) (a) of the Penal Code. The particulars of offence alleged that on 26/9/2000 at about 17.30 hours at ...

Debates continue to temper between scholars who contend that corporate social responsibility has benefits on the firm and those who argue that it has no any benefits on the firm. Therefore, this report aims at examining ...

This application has been brought under Notice of Motion under rule 3 (2) (a) of the Court of Appeal Rules, 1979 (the Rules) and Article 13 (3) (6) (a) of the Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania, 1977 as ...

On 8/9/2005 the appellant appeared before the District Court of Kasulu at Kasulu on a charge of Rape purportedly under cls 5 of the Sexual Offences Special Provisions Act. No.4 of 1998. As the appearance was made before ...

At the hearing of the appeal the appellant appeared in person, unrepresented. Ms. Beatrice Nsanalearned State Attorney represented the respondent Republic. After hearing both the appellant and Ms. Nsana who supported ...

The appellant, Boay Ahay, was arraigned before the District Court of Hanang sitting at Katesh, for unnatural offence, contrary to section 154(1) (a) & (2) of the Penal Code, Cap 16 as amended by section 16 of the Sexual ...

In the High Court of Tanzania, at Tabora, the appellant unsuccessfully sued the respondents for general damages amounting to a sum of shs. 500,000,000/= which allegedly arose form libel, trespass, false imprisonment and ...